SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1356

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
SANJU GANGWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
BA 1/1209/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: Mr. Pankaj Joshi

Bail granted due to lack of need for custodial interrogation when main charge lies with another accused.

Headnote:(A) BNS 2023 - Sections 3(5), 238, 309(6), 317(2) - Bail application - Applicant charged for offenses related to murder but asserted innocence based on lack of direct involvement - Court found that charge sheet has been filed and main role assigned to another - Considering no need for custodial interrogation, bail granted. (Paras 3, 6, 7)

(B) Legal principles regarding bail - Grant of bail does not equate to adjudication of guilt or implication of precedent for co-accused. (Paras 9)

SANJU GANGWAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND - 2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1356
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top