Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
Sumit Saini – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
SL. N o .
D a t e
Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s o r d i r e ct i o n s a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s
COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS
1 BA 1 N o .1 4 4 8 o f 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned . counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AAG for the State. 3. Present applicant– Sumit Saini S/o Mahendra Singh is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 11.02.2025 bearing FIR No. 0054 of 2025, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 123 , 126(2), 64(2)(m) read with Section 74 of BNS, 2023 and 66(E) and 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 . 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in judicial custody since 17.02.2025 and has been falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact that the victim herself refused to go with the medical examination and there is no any medical report, and, furthermore, the victim was declared hostile by the trial Court and her statement recorded
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
