SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1396

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Kumar Verma, J
RAKESH BHARDWAJ – Appellant
Versus
ANIL GIRI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Piyush Garg
For the Respondents: Siddhartha Singh

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
1 2 .0 8 .2 0 2 5 CLR No.22 of 2025 H o n ’ b l e A l o k K u m a r Ve r m a , J. The proposed Revision has been filed by t he defendant under Sect ion 25 of t he Provincial Sm all Cause Court s Act , 1887 against t he j udgm ent and decree dat ed 07.02.2025, passed by learned Judge, Sm all Causes Court / I I nd Addit ional Dist rict Judge, Haridwar in SCC Suit No.05 of 2021, whereby, t he learned Judge has decreed t he suit of possession, rent and m esne profit s. 2 . Heard Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for revisionist and Mr. Siddhart ha Singh, learned counsel for respondent - plaint iff. 3 . The respondent - plaint iff had filed t he said Suit in relat ion t o t wo shops aft er sending a quit not ice under Sect ion 106 of t he Transfer of Propert y Act , 1882. The allegat ion of t he plaint iff is t hat t he defendant had dem olished t he wall built bet ween t he said shops wit hout any perm ission

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top