Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Kumar Verma, J
Vipin Kashyap – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detention for the purpose of securing attendance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of eligibility for bail. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final order granting bail. (Para 9 , 10) |
22ND AUGUST, 2025 FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.1516 of 2025 Vipin Kashyap ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Himanshu Sain, Brief Holder Hon’ble Alok Kum ar Verm a,J.
The applicant-Vipin Kashyap is in judicial custody for the offence under Section 8 read with Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”) in Case Crime No.272 of 2025, registered at Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar.
2. According to the First Information Report dated 09.06.2025, the police party apprehended the applicant and recovered 53.22 gm. smack (heroin)
from his possession.
3. Heard Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for respondent.
4. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. Nothing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
