HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
Ajay Pal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail Application | HBA 1/1139/2025
SL. N o .
D a t e
Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s o r d i r e ct i o n s a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s
COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS
H BA 1 / 1 1 3 9 / 2 0 2 5 o n ' b l e Ra k e sh Th a p l i y a l , J. 1. Ms. Nishat I nt ezar, learned counsel for t he applicant . 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. for t he St at e. 3. Present applicant -Aj ay Pal, S/ o Madan Lal is praying for regular bail in relat ion t o FI R dat ed 07.05.2025, bearing FI R No. 0145 of 2025 regist ered at P.S. Kiccha, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar wherein t he present applicant along wit h one Om babu have been im plicat ed for t he offence punishable under Sect ion 8/ 21 of t he NDPS Act . 4. I t is subm it t ed by t he learned counsel for t he applicant t hat t he alleged cont raband, charas, which is shown t o be recovered from t he applicant is a non com m ercial quant it y, i.e. 23.78 gram s and t here is no subst ant ial com pliance of Sect ions 50, 52, 55 and 57 of t he NDPS Act , and is languishing in j ail since 07.05.2025. 5. On t he ot her side, Mr. Pal, learned A.G.A. for t he St at e has not disput ed t his fact t hat t he alleged cont raband which is shown t o be recovered from t he applicant is a non com m ercial quant it y but so far as non com pliance of t he m andat ory provisions of t he NDPS is concerned, he st rongly denied t he sam e. So far as crim inal hist ory of t he applicant is concerned, Mr. Pal subm it s t hat t he hist ory of t he applicant is being inquired. However, Ms. Nishat I nt ezar, learned counsel for t he applicant subm it s t hat t he applicant has no previous crim inal hist ory. 6. Aft er hearing t he argum ent s of t he
learned counsel for t he part ies and furt her t aking int o considerat ion t hat t he alleged cont raband which is shown t o be recovered from t he applicant is a non com m ercial quant it y and furt her in view of t he st at em ent as given by t he learned counsel for t he applicant t hat t he applicant has no previous crim inal hist ory, t his Court is of t he view t hat t he applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, wit hout expressing any opinion on t he m erit of t he case, t he bail applicat ion is allowed. 8. Let t he applicant “Aj ay” Pal be released on bail on his execut ing a personal bond and furnishing t wo reliable suret ies of t he like am ount t o t he sat isfact ion of t he court concerned. 9. I t is m ade clear t hat aft er being released on bail if t he applicant is found t o be indulged in any such act ivit ies, t hen t he prosecut ion is free t o m ove an applicat ion for cancellat ion of bail. ( Ra k e sh Th a p l i y a l , J.) 0 2 .0 7 .2 0 2 5 Parul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.