SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1595

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHASHIBALA – Appellant
Versus
VIRENDRA KUMAR – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 966 of 2021

11TH JULY, 2025 Shashibala --Petitioner Versus Virendra Kumar --Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jagdish Chandra Belwal & Mr. Kailash Chandra Tiwari, Advocates for the respondent.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

By means of this petition, filed under Article

227 of the Constitution, petitioner has sought the following relief:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record of the case and to quash judgment dated 27.02.2021 (Annexure No. 1), in regard to issuance of notice instead of granting interim injunction and further to allow the application of temporary injunction.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of her application filed under Oder 18 Rule 17 CPC by the Trial Court, as affirmed by Revisional Court. He submits that the Trial Court rejected the application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, vide order dated 16.08

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top