Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pankaj Purohit, J
Vipin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the fir and initial allegations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's arguments concerning fir and retraction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's view on the appropriateness of proceeding. (Para 6) |
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of the present C482 application, the applicant has challenged the charge-sheet dated 27.04.2016, cognizance/summoning order dated 24.04.2017 along with the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1633 of 2017 State Vs. Vipin and another, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehraudn, for the offences punishable u/s and 504 IPC.
3. The facts in brief are that respondent No.2 lodged an FIR on 07.03.2016 at P.S. Prem Nagar, Dehradun against the unknown persons (driver of vehicle No.UP07BM7461 and two others) alleging therein that she is student of BBA 2nd year in UPES and on 06.03.2016 at about 6-7 PM, while she was outside the campus with her classmate Achin, these persons teased her and on being protested, two-three persons came out from the vehicle and assaulted and abused her and her classmate.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
