Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
ADITYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL. N o .
D a t e
Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s o r d i r e ct i o n s a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s
COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS
BA 1 / 1 1 6 0 / 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. S. C. Burman, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘’Aditya, son of Shri Raju,” is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 06.03.2025 bearing FIR No. 68 of 2025, Police Station – Gangnahar, District – Haridwar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offence 137 (2) BNS, 2023 and on completion of the investigation, charge sheet has been filed for the offence punishable under Section 137 (2), 64 (2) (m), 65 (1) and 87 of BNS, 2023 and under Section 3(A)/4(2), 5 (l)/6 of the POCSO Act . 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and in fact, victim and applicant are in love with each other and victim though minor and 15 years old but applicant is also of tender age of 18 years. He further submits that whatever be the physical
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
