HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHASHIBALA – Appellant
Versus
VIRENDRA KUMAR – Respondent
HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 966 of 2021
11TH JULY, 2025 Shashibala --Petitioner Versus Virendra Kumar --Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jagdish Chandra Belwal & Mr. Kailash Chandra Tiwari, Advocates for the respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
By means of this petition, filed under Article
227 of the Constitution, petitioner has sought the following relief:-
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the record of the case and to quash judgment dated 27.02.2021 (Annexure No. 1), in regard to issuance of notice instead of granting interim injunction and further to allow the application of temporary injunction.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of her application filed under Oder 18 Rule 17 CPC by the Trial Court, as affirmed by Revisional Court. He submits that the Trial Court rejected the application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, vide order dated 16.08
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.