Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
SHYAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION OFFICER – Respondent
| SL. N o . | D a t e | Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s o r d i r e ct i o n s a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s | COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS |
| ( H ( ( W PM S 2 0 7 5 / 2 0 2 5 o n ’ b l e M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J. Mr. Deepak Pet shali, Advocat e, for t he pet it ioner. for Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deput y AG, t he St at e. ( 2) By m eans of t his writ pet it ion, pet it ioner has sought t he follow ing reliefs: “ ( i) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ur e of m andam us direct ing t he respondent no. 2 t o rest rained from t aking possession of t he above said propert y and t he pet it ioner should not be evict ed fr om t he said propert y. ( ii) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ur e of m andam us direct ing t he respondent no. 1 t ake necessar y act ion in pet it ioner applicat ion which is pending before t he r espondent no. 1 ( Deput y Direct or Consolidat ion Officer, Roorkee) ” Learned Counsel for t he 3) pet it ion |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
