Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Ravindra Maithani, J
Bachuli Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's nomination was improperly rejected leading to the challenge. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court's stance on non-interference in elections and dismissal without admission. (Para 2 , 9) |
| 3. respondents assert the legitimacy of rejection based on constitutional provisions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. legal standards for challenging election processes under specified statutes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. final ruling; writ petition dismissed. (Para 10) |
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)
The challenge in this petition has been made to the order dated 08.07.2025, passed by the respondent no.5, the Returning Officer, Block Okhalkanda, Nainital, by which the nomination of the petitioner has wrongly been rejected contesting election of member Kshetra Panchayat. The petitioner has also sought other reliefs.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that at the time of submission of the nomination papers , the petitioner has submitted all the relevant documents, which is clear by Annexure 2. But, it is argued that in the rejection order, it is recorded that the documents were incomplete. It argued that, in fact, the documents we
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
