HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pankaj Purohit, J
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand & another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputed property based on forged will (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural errors in property attachment (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. application dismissed due to lack of merits (Para 6) |
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
This application preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.08.2023 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Uttarkashi in Criminal Revision No.17 of 2019, Gulbiya vs. Manoj alias Manoj Kumar & another. By the said judgment and order dated 16.08.2023, learned Sessions Judge quashed the order dated 16.09.2019 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Uttarkashi, whereby the application of the present applicant under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. was disposed of and the land in-question was attached.
2. Facts in nutshell are that an application under Section 145 Cr.P.C. was filed by the applicant against the respondent no.2 stating therein that on the subject land, the applicant was recorded as tenure holder who got the said land after the death of his maternal grandfather. The respondent no.2 wanted to mutate his name over the said piece of land on the strength of a forged Will, the said case filed by the applicant against respondent no.2 was dismisse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.