Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pankaj Purohit, J
Parmal – Appellant
Versus
Pali & others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of order regarding fraudulent land transfers. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the dismissal of application for fir registration. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observations on civil versus criminal jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. the rationale behind upholding trial court's decision. (Para 8) |
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
By means of present criminal revision, revisionist has put to challenge the order dated 04.07.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Misc. Criminal Case No.11 of 2024, Parmal vs. Pali & another and further directed the learned Sessions Judge to allow the application filed by the revisionist under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and summon the respondents under appropriate Sections of BNS, 2023 as well as under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. Brief facts of the case are that an application was filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code by the applicant, Parmal—an individual belonging to a Scheduled Caste—seeking registration of an FIR against several individuals, including private persons and government officials, at the Piran Kaliyar Police Station in Haridwar. The core of the applicant’s c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
