SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 2218

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Alok Kumar Verma, J
MOHANLAL – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR PANCHAYAT LAKSAR DISTRICT HARIDWAR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Himanshu Pal
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashutosh Thakral

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
2 2 .0 7 .2 0 2 5 FA No.107 of 2022 H o n ’ b l e A l o k K u m a r Ve r m a , J. Heard Mr. Him anshu Pal, learned counsel for appellant and Mr. Ashut osh Thakral, learned counsel ( t hrough video conferencing) for respondent no.1 on t he Applicat ion ( Civil Miscellaneous Applicat ion No.02 of 2025) . 2 . Mr. Him anshu Pal, Advocat e, subm it t ed t hat t here is no disput e bet ween t he part ies regarding t he boundaries of t he suit propert y. The appellant want s t o const ruct a wall on t he exist ing boundary of t he suit propert y t o prot ect t he propert y- in- quest ion. 3 . Mr. Ashut osh Thakral, Advocat e, subm it t ed t hat t he perm ission t o const ruct t he boundary wall m ay be grant ed on t he following condit ions: -

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top