Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pankaj Purohit, J
Dheeraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of marriage between revisionist and respondent leading to maintenance application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. revisionist's financial hardship against maintenance obligations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's upholding of lower court's decision on maintenance. (Para 5 , 6) |
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)
By means of the present criminal revision, the revisionist has put to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated 05.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Criminal Case No.16 of 2025 Jyoti Bora Vs. Dheeraj Singh, whereby, the application 5ga filed by the respondent No.2 for interim maintenance was allowed and the revisionist was directed to pay Rs.4,000/-per month as interim maintenance, on 10th day of each month from the date of filing that application for interim maintenance.
2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist-husband and respondent No.2-wife were got married on 23.11.2024 as per Hindu rites and rituals, but, later on some marital discord cropped up between the husband and the wife. Thereafter, the respondent No.2-wife had instituted a Misc. Criminal Case under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
