SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 2450

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
RAHUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ankur Sharma
For the Respondents: Himanshu Sain

SL. N o . D a t e Of f i ce N o t e s, r e p o r t s, o r d e r s o r p r o ce e d i n g s o r d i r e ct i o n s a n d Re g i st r a r ’ s o r d e r w i t h Si g n a t u r e s COURT’ S OR JUD GE’ S ORD ERS
1 BA 1 N o .1 1 0 2 o f 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. . Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State . 3. Present applicant– Vikram Son of Rajkumar is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 10.02.2025 bearing FIR No. 0047 of 2025, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun, which was lodged against unknown person for the offence punishable under Section 305(a) and 331(4) of BNS , 2023. On completion of the investigation, the applicant was charge- sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 3(5), 331(4) and 317(2) BNS , 2023. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Apart from this, he submits that the applicant is permanent resident of Sapera Basti of District Dehradun and a Rickshaw Driver and a married person having two children. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top