Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rakesh Thapliyal, J
Banmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement (ED) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. supplementary complaints evaluated under new law. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. timeline and implications of original and supplementary complaints. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. nature of supplementary complaints treated as fresh arguments. (Para 8) |
| 4. scheduling for continued arguments. (Para 10) |
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, learned counsel for the Enforcement Directorate advanced his arguments in respect of the order passed by the learned Magistrate dated 27.07.2024 wherein, the cognizance was taken on the supplementary complaint filed in relation to the ECIR/DNSZO/04/2023 dated 24.07.2023 and submits that in fact the original complaint in relation to this ECIR was filed on 24.06.2024, wherein, the cognizance was taken on 02.07.2024. Subsequent thereto the supplementary prosecution complaint was filed against Banmeet Singh on 26.07.2024, wherein, learned Magistrate took cognizance on 27.07.2024. He submits that w.e.f. 01.07.2024 the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short BNSS, 2023) came into force and, therefore, in respect of the supplementary complaint, which pertains to the ECIR/DNSZO/04/2023 is nothing but deemed to part of the original
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
