Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Kusum Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
SL. No.
Dat e
Office Not es, report s, order s or proceedings or direct ions and Regist rar ’s order wit h Signat ures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
1 W PSS/ 1 6 5 3 / 2 0 2 3 Wit h W PSS N os. 5 4 0 / 2 0 2 5 , 1 7 8 / 2 0 2 4 , 1 7 9 / 2 0 2 4 , 2 3 9 / 2 0 2 4 , 2 4 8 / 2 0 2 4 , 3 8 / 2 0 2 5 , 1 9 3 / 2 0 2 5 , 1 9 4 / 2 0 2 5 , 2 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 , 4 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 , 4 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 , 4 3 6 / 2 0 2 5 , 4 3 7 / 2 0 2 5 , 4 3 8 / 2 0 2 5 a nd 5 4 2 / 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner in WPSS Nos. 540/2025 and 438/2025. Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisth, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. . Petitioners in these writ petitions were appointed on compassionate ground as daily wager on account of death of the breadwinners in their family, who were serving in work charged establishment in different engineering departments of the State. 2. According to petitioners, they have serve
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
