NEETU vs GRAM SABHA KANHEWALI RAISING PARGANA GORDHANPUR TEHSIL LAKSAR DISTT HARIDWAR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SL. N o.	D a t e	Office N ot e s, r e por t s, or de r s or pr oce e dings or dir e ct ions a nd Re gist r a r ’s or de r w it h Signa t ur e s	COURT’S OR JUD GE’S ORD ERS
			6 H 5 4 W PM S N o. 8 7 of 2 0 2 5 on ’ble M a n oj Ku m a r Tiw a r i, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for t he pet it ioner. Bhargava, learned 2. Ms. Anj ali counsel for respondent no. 1. Mr. Raj esh Pandey, learned 3. St anding Counsel for t he St at e of Ut t arakhand / respondent no. 2. By m eans of t his writ pet it ion, . pet it ioner has challenged j udgm ent & order dat ed 25.03.2011 passed by Assist ant Collect or, I st Class, Laksar, Dist rict Haridwar in Suit No.57 of 2006, whereby his Declarat ory Suit under Sect ion 229- B of Zam indari Abolit ion & Land Reform s Act , was dism issed. He has also challenged t he j udgm ent & order dat ed 08.06.2022 and 27.11.2024 passed by First and Second Appellat e Court s. I t t ranspires t hat pet it ioner filed a . suit for declaring him t o be a Bhum idhar, based on his cont inuous possession over t he l