Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
OM PRAKASH TEWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL. N o.
D a t e
Office N ot e s, r e por t s, or de r s or pr oce e dings or dir e ct ions a nd Re gist r a r ’s or de r w it h Sign a t u r e s
COURT’S OR JUD GE’S ORD ERS
1 H W PCRL N o. 3 7 6 of 2 0 2 4 on 'ble Ra k e sh Th a pliya l, J. . Mr. Dushyant Mainali, learned counsel for t he pet it ioner. 2. Mr. Am it Bhat t , learned Governm ent Advocat e wit h Mr. Kuldeep Singh, learned A.G.A. for t he St at e. 3. Mr. D.K. Sharm a, learned Senior Advocat e assist ed by Mr. Raj Kishore Chaudhary, Mr. P.K. Mit t al and Mr. Maneesh Bisht , learned counsel for t he respondent no.3. 4. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for t he CBI . 5. Learned counsel for respondent no. 3 subm it s t hat SI T has not given sufficient t im e t o respondent no. 3 t o furnish t heir det ails, t hough, SI T filed bulky report . Now, in com pliance t o t he order passed by t his Court on 19.11.2024, a det ailed affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 3 disclosing t he det ails of m ovable and im m ovable propert ies. He also subm it s t hat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
