Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL. N o.
D a t e
Office N ot e s, r e por t s, or de r s or pr oce e dings or dir e ct ions a nd Re gist r a r ’s or de r w it h Signa t ur e s
COURT’S OR JUD GE’S ORD ERS
( 4 5 6 ( ( W PM S/ 3 0 2 9 / 2 0 2 5 H on’ble M a noj Kum a r Tiw a r i, J 1. Mr. Ankur Sharm a, learned counsel for t he pet it ioner. 2. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deput y Advocat e General for t he St at e of Ut t arakhand. Mr. Pankaj Chat urvedi, learned 3. counsel for t he respondent- Ut t arakhand Jal Sanst han. According t o pet it ioner, he is . Bhum idhar in possession over a piece of land, over which, Ut t arakhand Jal Sanst han is proposing t o const ruct a Sewage Treat m ent Plant . By m eans of t his writ pet it ion, . pet it ioner has sought t he following relief: - i) I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ure of Mandam us rest raining t he respondent s from int erfer ing w it h or t aking possession of t he pet it ioner ’s propert y bearing Khat a No. 00582 having it s Khasra No. 1329 Village Bhim awala, Pargana Pachwadoon, Tehsil Vikasnagar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
