Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHAKEEL KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL. N o.
D a t e
Office N ot e s, r e por t s, or de r s or pr oce e dings or dir e ct ions a nd Re gist r a r ’s or de r w it h Signa t ur e s
COURT’S OR JUD GE’S ORD ERS
1 6 ( 5 4 WPMS No. 3583 of 2023 Wit h WPMS No. 3569 of 2023 WPMS No. 3570 of 2023 WPMS No. 3575 of 2023 WPMS No. 3578 of 2023 WPMS No. 3581 of 2023 WPMS No. 3600 of 2023 H on’ble M a noj Kum a r Tiw a r i, J Mr. Dushyant Manali, lear ned counsel . for t he pet it ioners. Mr. Suyash Pant , lear ned St anding 2. Counsel for t he St at e of Ut t arakhand. 3. Mr. B.D. Pande, learned counsel for t he respondent - Nagar Palika Parishad Ram nagar . Pet it ioner s wer e let out shops by Nagar Palika Parishad Ram nagar. Since pet it ioners did not pay rent in r espect of shops for cert ain period, t herefor e, Nagar Palika Parishad Ram nagar issued recover y cert ificat es, pursuant t o which Tehsildar Ram nagar issued cit at ions for recovery of am ount of unpaid rent . Thus, feeling aggrieved pet it ioners have filed t hese w rit pet it ions challenging t he r ecovery cit at ions. . Since
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
