Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIJAY – Appellant
Versus
MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
SL. No
Date
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
D1- 02
WPMS No.3205 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the respondent no.1/MDDA. Heard. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent nos. 2 and 3 separately sought permission from the respondent no.1/ Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority (“the Authority”) for development of their land situated at Veerpur Khurd, Rishikesh. The Authority sanctioned the plan and one of the conditions for sanctioning the map was that the constructions shall be done as per the approved map specification, but, instead of raising separate construction, according to the petitioner, the respondent nos. 2 and 3 started raising one commercial building in complete deviation of the approved map. Complaint was submitted to the Authority, but no action has been taken on it. Therefore, the petitioner seeks directions that the Authority may be directed to decide the complaints bea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
