SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3448

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VAIRAGYA PURI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL. Dat or directions No. e and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2025:UHC:10728 WPCRL No.1382 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Vivek Shukla, Mr. Bhuwnesh Joshi, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand/1 to 3.

3. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned counsel for the Respondent No.4.

4. The present Petitioner has put a challenge to the FIR No.0298 of 2025, which was registered at Police Station Kankhal, District Haridwar for his alleged involvement in commission of the offences under Sections 316 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

5. As far as the offences under Sections 316 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, are concerned, it carry a sentence of less than seven years, and it will be covered by the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matters of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State Of Bihar” reported in 2014 (8) SCC 273 where the Applicant is required to surrender before the court and seek his bail. However, the said benefit of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar”, would be extended to the Petitioner, subject to the condition that he cooperate with the inv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top