2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3485
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VISHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
15.12.2025 BA1 No.1469 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent.
2. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, submitted that the alleged victim has not supported the case of the prosecution before the trial. He has sought two days’ time to file a copy of the statements of the victim.
3. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate, has also sought two days’ time to get instruction.
4. Time is granted.
5. List on 18.12.2025 after fresh cases.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)
15.12.2025 Neha
Click Here to Read the rest of this document