SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3500

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GURVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

15th DECEMBER, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1252 OF 2025 Gurvinder Singh ..... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 688 of 2020, registered at Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar under Section 386 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. .

2. The Anticipatory Bail Application of the applicant has been rejected by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar on 02.12.2025.

3. According to the First Information Report dated 16.12.2020, the applicant and other co-accused threatened the informant on 15.12.2020 that if he did not give Rs.10,00,000/-, they would kill him and his children.

4. Heard Mr. Deepak Petshali, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the respondent.

5. Mr. Deepak Petshali, Advocate, has submitted that the allegations are false and fabricated. Applicant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top