SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3508

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SAVI VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/ 1122/ 2024 With WPMS/ 868/ 2024 WPMS/ 869/ 2024 WPMS/ 874/ 2024 WPMS/ 1123/ 2024 WPMS/ 1124/ 2024 WPMS/ 1126/ 2024 WPMS/ 1176/ 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for the State.

2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition No. 1122 of 2024 (MS) alone are being discussed and considered.

3. Petitioners took admission in MBBS Course in different Medical Colleges, within the State of Uttarakhand, during Academic Sessions 2017-18 and 2018-19 and they pursued MBBS course on subsidised fee by executing a Bond that they would serve for minimum five years in remote hill areas of State of Uttarakhand.

4. The grievance raised by petitioners is that the students who took admission in MBBS course before Academic Session 2017-18, were required to execute bond only for three years, while the condition of f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top