SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3515

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DHARMENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 1957/ 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. S.K. Posti, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Ashutosh Posti, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for the State.

2. Petitioner participated in a selection for the post of Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) in a Government aided institution. A list of top seven candidates were prepared by competent authority and, according to petitioner, he was placed at serial number 2 in the list of shortlisted candidates.

3. After issuance of call letter to all shortlisted candidates including petitioner, the selection process was cancelled pursuant to a Government Order. Petitioner challenged cancellation of selection by filing Writ Petition No. 1233 of 2019 (SS), which was allowed vide order dated 11.11.2021 and authorities were directed to give appointment to the petitioner, pursuant to his placement in the select list. However, in Appeal, the direction issued by learned Single Judge to appoint petitioners was set aside; however it was provided that the authority will proceed with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top