SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3523

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VINAY KUMAR BISNOI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Judgment Reserved on: 18.11.2025 Judgment Delivered on: 12.12.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory BailApplication No.130 of 2025 Vinay Kumar Bisnoi ......Applicant Vs.

State of Uttarakhand …..Respondent Presence Mr. M.K. Goyal, learned counsel for the Applicant.

Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder, for State of Uttarakhand .

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

The present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed by the Applicant in connection with FIR No.250 of 2024, Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun, registered under Sections 316 (2), 318 (4), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2) and 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The gravamen of the allegations is that the Applicant, acting in concert with other individuals, induced the Informant to part with substantial amounts of money and created an impression of lawful ownership over certain immovable property. It is alleged that forged documents were utilised to represent title and that the Informant was deceived into entering a transaction which subsequently resulted in financial loss.

2. The Informant has further alleged that upon discovery of the alleged misrepresentation, he sought clarification and a refund, but the Applican

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top