SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3525

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
JOGENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

12.12.2025 ABA No.1226 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

This is an Anticipatory Bail Application.

2. Heard Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, learned counsel for applicants and Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for respondent.

3. Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate, submitted that the applicants were granted regular bail in Case Crime No.575 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) and Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Police Station Pathri, District Haridwar. Now, Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 has been added. Non-bailable warrants have been issued against the applicants. He further submitted on instruction that the applicants undertake that upon the cancellation of the non-bailable warrants, issued against the applicants, they shall continue to appear before the concerned Court.

4. Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder, has sought two weeks’ time to file objection to the anticipatory bail application.

5. Time is granted.

6. The execution of the non-bailable warrants, issued a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top