SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3529

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
TIPU KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

11.12.2025 BA1 No.1713 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Heard Mr. Vishwa Prakash Bahuguna, learned counsel for applicant and Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for respondent.

2. Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder, submitted that the instruction has not been received from the Investigating Officer. She has sought further time to get instruction.

3. In the interest of justice, time is granted, but on the cost of Rs.5,000 (Rupees Five Thousand) imposed on the Investigating Officer.

4. List on 23.12.2025 as a fresh case.

5. The said cost shall be deposited with the High Court Advocate Welfare Fund.

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)

11.12.2025 Neha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top