IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Appeal No. 66 of 1987 State. ………………… Appellant.

Versus Virendra Kumar and Another.

……………Respondents.

With First Appeal No. 27 of 2006 State. ………………… Appellant.

Versus Ravi Kumar.

……………Respondent.

With First Appeal No. 28 of 2006 State. ………………… Appellant.

Versus Ravi Kumar.

……………Respondent.

With First Appeal No. 29 of 2006 State. ………………… Appellant.

Versus Smt. Shanti Devi and Others.

……………Respondents.

With First Appeal No. 30 of 2006 State. ………………… Appellant.

Versus Smt. Ishwari Devi (Deceased) and Others.

……………Respondents.

Present:

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

Mr. D.S. Patni, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Karmanya Pande, learned counsel for the respondent.

Mr. Lalit Sharma and Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the respondent in the connected matter.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel pointed out that the Hon’ble Apex Court in its judgment take note in para 20 of the judgment about the order of the Board of Revenue passed in review application, which was never been challenged by the respondent/plaintiff.

2. Mr. D.S. Patni, learned senior coun