SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3566

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
BRIJ MOHAN PAINULY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Judgment Reserved on : 10.11.2025 Judgment Delivered on : 11.12.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No.1904 of 2021 Brij Mohan Painuly and Another .....Applicants Vs.

State of Uttarakhand & Another ...Respondents Presence: Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel for the Applicants.

Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned counsel for the State.

Mr. D.S. Mehta, learned counsel for Respondent No.2.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the Applicants, namely Brij Mohan Painuly and his son Lalit Mohan Painuly, seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 69 of 2021, titled State vs. Brij Mohan Painuly and others, pending before the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. The Applicants further seek quashing of the charge-sheet submitted in the said case, as well as the cognizance and summoning order dated 04.04.2021 passed by the learned Magistrate, whereby they were summoned to face trial for offences punishable under Sections 406, 506 and 120 B IPC.

2. The genesis of the criminal proceedings lies in a complaint lodged by Respondent No. 2,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top