HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal from Order No.360 of 2014 Sri Rajesh Kumar Sharma ………Appellant Versus Uttaranchal Iron and Ispat Ltd. and another ………Respondents Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the appellant appeared through video conferencing.

Mr. P.C. Maulekhi, Advocate for the respondent.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) has been preferred by the claimant/appellant challenging the judgment and order dated 13.10.2013 passed by the learned Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, Dehradun, in Case No. 50 of 2012, Sri Rajesh Kumar Sharma vs. Uttaranchal Iron & Ispat Limited and another. By the said order, the learned Commissioner held that an amount of Rs. 1,87,617/- has already been paid to the claimant during the pendency of the proceedings, and that in the absence of any certificate of disability indicating the percentage of permanent disability, no further compensation could be assessed or granted. The appellant contends that the learned Commissioner erred in law in denying him compensation for permanent disability resulting from the amputation of his left arm, an