SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3601

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SOHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 762/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ganesh Datt Kandpal, Deputy AG, for the State.

Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, for the respondent no. 4.

(2) According to petitioners, they participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Medical Service Selection Board for appointment to the post of Nursing Officer; they were selected and recommended by the selecting body, however, the appointing authority is not issuing offer of appointment to them. In this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:

“I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to issue the appointment orders to the petitioners for the post of nursing officers (male)

under the said department.

2. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to issue the order of appointment post code number 203, 204 name as diploma holder and degree holder nursing officer (male) to the petitioner like petitioner of writ petition number 1317/2024/J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top