SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3611

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANISHA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . . D e a t an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS order with Signatures WPCRL No. 1646 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following prayer:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 03.08.2025 registered as FIR No. 0133 of 2025 under Sections 120B, 406, 420, 506 IPC, Police Station Vasant Vihar, Dehradun.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest or take any coercive action against the Petitioners in relation with First Information Report dated 03.08.2025 registered as FIR No. 0133 of 2025 under Sections 120B, 406, 420, 506 IPC, registered at P.S.

Vasant Vihar, Dehradun.”

4. The Petitioner has also filed an Interim Relief Application, being I.A. No. 01 of 2025, seeking a stay on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top