SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3624

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
TIRUPATI ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/B) No. 883 of 2025 Tirupati Associates ......Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Present:

Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sachin Mohan Singh Mehta, Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos. 1, 2 & 5.

Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 6/Municipal Corporation.

Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

By means of instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent Municipal Corporation and its officers to forthwith discharge their statutory duty by taking immediate steps to demolish the dangerous and dilapidated building bearing Property No. 29/49, situated at Rajpur Road, Mansharam Building, near Dhara Police Chowki, Dehradun.

(ii) Direct the respondent Municipal Corporation to provide a status report on the steps taken to secure and demolish the structure bearing Property No. 29/49, situated at Rajpur Road, Mansharam Building, near Dhara Police Chowki, Dehradun.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or dire

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top