SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3631

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AMAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders SL. or proceedings Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS 3294/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, i/b Mr.

Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State.

(2) Petitioners run a pet boarding facility at Dehradun. Their pet boarding facility has been directed to be sealed by the District Magistrate, vide order dated 13.11.2025, which is impugned in this writ petition. Impugned order has been passed by invoking power under Section 29 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, which reads as under:

29. Power of court to deprive person convicted of ownership of animal.―(1) If the owner of any animal is found guilty of any offence under this Act, the court, upon his conviction thereof, may, if it thinks fit, in addition to any other punishment, make an order that the animal with respect to which the offence was committed shall be forfeited to Government and may, further, make such order as to the disposal of the animal as it thinks fit under the circumstances.

(2) No order under sub-section (1) shall be made unless it is shown b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top