SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3634

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ARTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders SL. or proceedings Date COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No. or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS/ 3407/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.

2. There is a Government Hospital at Uttarkashi, which needs to be upgraded to cater to the needs of the town.

3. Since the land earmarked for hospital was found to be inadequate for constructing Critical Care Unit and district administration decided to take part of land allotted to Government Inter College, abutting the hospital, for the purpose. The Critical Care Unit, however, was constructed elsewhere and it is now decided to construct residential accommodation for Doctors over the land which was originally taken for constructing Critical Care Unit. Petitioners have challenged the said decision in this writ petition.

4. Petitioner No. 1 claims to be President of Parents-Teachers Association. Petitioner No. 2 contends that his grandfather donated the land for establishment of Government Inter College.

5. Learned State Counsel is right in submitting locus standi that petitioners do not have any to challenge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top