SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3635

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures D1-

09 WPSB No.531 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pooran Singh Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the State.

Mr. Gaurav Nagpal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent no.2.

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-

i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the record and quashing Clause 8 ‘Age’ of the Advertisement dated 13.11.2025 (Annexure No.04 to the writ petition), so far as it provides the upper age limit of 42 years for participating in the selection process inasmuch as no provision for relaxation has been provided in favour of the candidates working as Medical Officer on contract basis in the Department.

ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for granting relaxation in upper age limit in favour of the petitioner for participating in the regular selection process initiated on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top