SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3651

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPAK SINGH ALIAS DEVENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders SL. Dat or proceedings COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s order with Signatures IA No.1/2025 (Bail Application)

With CRLR No.802 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Harsh Vardhan Dhanik, learned counsel for the Revisionist.

2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Proposed Revisionist was convicted under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 of IPC, and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months under Section 323 of IPC; and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of five years under Section 325 of IPC; and was sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment under Section 504 of IPC, and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months simple imprisonment under Section 506 of IPC vide judgment and order dated 03.06.2025, passed by the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champawat. An appeal (Criminal Appeal No.27 of 2025) was filed by the Revisionist. The said appeal has been dismissed vide judgment and order dated 12.11.2025, passed by the court of learned District Judge, District Champawat. Hence, the pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top