SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3664

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Ashish Naithani, J
Ravi Kant Sagar – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Anugya Shaiwal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sagar Kothari
For the Respondents: Mr. Piyush Garg

Table of Content
1. factual basis of the petition and application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by the petitioner regarding jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 6 , 8)
3. respondent's defense against petitioner's allegations and proper approach. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's observation on jurisdictional discretion and review standards. (Para 15 , 16 , 18)
5. final determination and dismissal of the petition. (Para 19 , 21)

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India has been instituted by the Petitioner, Ravi Kant Sagar, assailing the order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun, in Case No. 671 of 2023 (Ravi Kant Sagar v. Smt. Anugya Shaiwal). By the said order, the learned Family Court disposed of Paper No. 37-Kha, an application filed by the Petitioner under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , observing that the application shall be considered at the stage of final disposal of the

case.

2. The proceedings before the learned Family Court arise out of a matrimonial dispute between the parties. The Petitioner has instituted a petition seeking the dissolution of the marriage. During

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top