SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3673

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIKAS KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

09.12.2025 ABA No.1240 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Anticipatory Bail Application of the applicant has been rejected by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Laksar, District Haridwar on

17.11.2025.

2. Heard Mr. Shakib Husain, learned counsel for applicant and Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for respondent.

3. Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder, has sought three days’ time to get instruction.

4. Time is granted.

5. List on 15.12.2025 as a fresh case.

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)

09.12.2025 Neha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top