SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 3708

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAHUL GUMBER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

08.12.2025 ABA No.1215 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Heard Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for applicant, Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for respondent no.1 and Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2.

2. Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate, has sought one week’s time to file his Vakalatnama and objection to the present fresh Anticipatory Bail Application.

3. Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder, has also sought one week’s time to get instruction/ to file objection to the present fresh Anticipatory Bail Application.

4. Time is granted.

5. List on 18.12.2025.

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)

08.12.2025 Neha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top