SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 15043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HARIMOHAN GULHATI – Appellant
Versus
GOVIND PRASAD – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or SL.

Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No.3597 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for petitioners-defendants.

2. Mr. Prashant Trivedi, learned counsel for respondent-plaintiff, through V.C.

3. By means of present writ petition, petitioners-defendants have challenged the order dated 14.11.2025 passed by learned Assistant Collector First Class, Rishikesh, in Case No.05 of 2023 Govind Prasad Bahaguna Vs. Harimohan Gulati and Ors.; as well as the order dated 15.12.2025 passed by learned Board of Revenue in Land Revenue Revision No.3 of 2025-26 Harimohan Vs. Govind Prasad and Ors., whereby, the revision petition filed by the petitioners was rejected.

4. It is the contention of learned counsel for petitioners that controversy arose on filing of an application of the respondent under Section 41 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, for demarcation of the land in-question comprised in Khasra No.276/49. The said application was allowed by the learned Assistant Collector vide order dated 14.11.2025. The said order was challenged by the petitioners by filing the Lan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top