SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 19043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S AAGYA BIOTECH PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPCRL/ 1754/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

1. Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Petitioner is running an Industrial Unit, which runs a Manufacturing Unit. According to petitioner, respondent nos. 4 & 5 are holding agitation in front of factory premises of petitioner, due to which the production in the Manufacturing Unit is affected.

4. The reliefs, sought in the writ petition, are as follows:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents No. 1 to 3 to ensure that no protest, picketing, or demonstration takes place within 300 meters radius of the Petitioner’s factory premises, so as to unimpeded access to the premises and prevent obstruction to lawful business operations.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the Petitioner, its management, staff, and goods entering or exi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top