HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Nityanand Bhatt And Others – Appellant
Versus
State And Others – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or SL.
Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No.869 of 2008 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Karmanya Pandey and Mr.
Pradeep Lohani, learned counsel for petitioners/applicants.
2. Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Kumar Nailwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 and 3.
3. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.2, appeared through V.C.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners/ applicants has moved restoration application (MCC/3038/2025), whereby, petitioners/applicants want to recall the order dated 05.09.2017, whereby, the writ petition was dismissed for non-
prosecution.
5. There is a delay of 2068 days in filing the instant restoration application, therefore, delay condonation application (IA/3039/2025) has also been filed for condoning the delay.
6. The objections were called from the respondents on the delay condonation application as well as on the restoration application. Respondents have filed their objections, which are taken on record. Misc. Applications (IA Nos.3042, 3043, 3044, all of 2025) made therefor, are allowed.
7.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.