SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 30043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Nityanand Bhatt And Others – Appellant
Versus
State And Others – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or SL.

Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No.869 of 2008 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Karmanya Pandey and Mr.

Pradeep Lohani, learned counsel for petitioners/applicants.

2. Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Kumar Nailwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 and 3.

3. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.2, appeared through V.C.

4. Learned counsel for petitioners/ applicants has moved restoration application (MCC/3038/2025), whereby, petitioners/applicants want to recall the order dated 05.09.2017, whereby, the writ petition was dismissed for non-

prosecution.

5. There is a delay of 2068 days in filing the instant restoration application, therefore, delay condonation application (IA/3039/2025) has also been filed for condoning the delay.

6. The objections were called from the respondents on the delay condonation application as well as on the restoration application. Respondents have filed their objections, which are taken on record. Misc. Applications (IA Nos.3042, 3043, 3044, all of 2025) made therefor, are allowed.

7.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top