HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HARISH SINGH BISHT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 2231 / 2025
##PAGE1##
2025:UHC:11532
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
WPSS/ 2231/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kum ar Tiw ari, J
1. Mr. Tushar Prajapati, learned
counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Petitioner was reportedly engaged
under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme in Rural
Development Department, as Computer
Programmer in 2013. His engagement
was discontinued by Chief Development
Officer, Nainital, vide order dated
19.07.2025. Thus, feeling aggrieved,
petitioner has approached this Court
challenging the order dated 19.07.2025.
4. It is contended that petitioner’s
engagement is discontinued with total
non-application of mind. The removal
order is passed in colourable exercise of
power for extraneous reasons and there
is no reference to any misconduct,
allegedly committed by petitioner.
5. Learned State Counsel, however,
submits that complaint against the
petitioner was that he avoids performing
duty and shifts responsibility to other
employees. He further submits that
petitioner uses intemperate language
and disobeys lawful orders of his
Superior Authorities.
6. Upon perusal of impugned order,
this Court is prima facie satisfied that the
material for discontinuing petitioner’s
##PAGE2##2025:UHC:11532
engagement is not sufficient. Since
petitioner has served for twelve long
years as outsourced employee,
therefore, he has earned certain rights,
which cannot be taken away in such a
cursory manner.
7. Having regard to the facts of the
case, the writ petition is disposed of with
liberty to petitioner to make
representation for his re-engagement.
Along with his representation, petitioner
will file an undertaking in the shape of an
affidavit that he will discharge all lawful
duties as are assigned to him by his
Superior Authorities, and in case of any
failure on his part to discharge assigned
duties, he shall be liable to be
disengaged. Subject to petitioner’s
making representation and filing
affidavit, as above, within two weeks
from today, decision thereupon shall be
taken by Chief Development Officer,
Nainital, sympathetically, within three
weeks thereafter.
(Manoj Kumar Tiw ari, J)
23.12.2025
Aswal
NSIINTGI RHA AJ SWALDirg:tca=2luym s,o.1ned4bECBNO5ITURA-0JFS'7G9H8WK1LD2,oEu3=OURTKEN,2.3540=Beac6n7ITR8AJ1S93GfHW40L5a23bd16ef, postlCd=61UTARKHND
##PAGE3##2025:UHC:11532
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.