HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANJEEV AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
C482 557 / 2024
##PAGE1##
2024:UHC:7350
Judgment Reserved on: 28.11.2025
Judgment Delivered on: 23.12.2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Criminal Misc. Application No.557 of 2024
Sanjeev Agarwal ......Applicant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand & Another ....Respondents
Presence: Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Applicant.
Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Mr. Ayush Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel appearing through V.C.
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J
The present Criminal Miscellaneous Application has been filed
under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Applicant,
Sanjeev Agrawal, seeking interference with the order dated 01.02.2024
passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st, Dehradun, in Misc. Case
No.97 of 2020 (Parul Agrawal v. Sanjeev Agrawal). By the said order, the
learned Magistrate issued a recovery warrant for an amount of
₹5,69,167/-, purportedly towards arrears of interim maintenance payable
under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
2. The challenge in the present application is confined to the legality
and propriety of the recovery order dated 01.02.2024, and the manner in
which the recovery proceedings were conducted by the court below. The
Applicant does not, in these proceedings, assail the original orders
granting interim maintenance, but questions the issuance of coercive
recovery without adequate opportunity of hearing and without
adjudication of objections regarding the calculation of arrears.
1
Criminal Misc. Application No.557 of 2024........Sanjeev Agarwal vs. State of Uttarakhand & Another.
Ashish Naithani J.
##PAGE2##3. The Applicant and Respondent No. 2 are husband and wife. Their
marriage was solemnized on 01.12.1996 in accordance with Hindu rites
and customs. Three children were born from the wedlock. It is not in
dispute that the parties have been living separately since the year 2017.
4. On 24.05.2018, Respondent No. 2 instituted proceedings under
Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005, before the learned Magistrate at Dehradun.
Along with the main application, an application under Section 23 of the
Act seeking interim maintenance was also filed.
5. By order dated 08.08.2019, the learned Magistrate directed the
Applicant to pay a sum of ₹ 25,000/- per month as interim maintenance to
Respondent No. 2 from the date of filing of the application.
6. The said order was carried in appeal by both parties. The Criminal
Appeal preferred by the Applicant was dismissed, while the appeal
preferred by Respondent No. 2 was partly allowed by the learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun, by judgment dated 05.12.2019,
whereby the interim maintenance was enhanced to ₹ 30,000/- per month.
7. Subsequent to the appellate judgment, disputes continued between
the parties regarding compliance with the maintenance orders.
Proceedings were initiated from time to time, including earlier
proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C, which came to be dismissed by
this Court by order dated 27.12.2023.
8. Thereafter, Respondent No. 2 initiated recovery proceedings before
the learned Judicial Magistrate, alleging non-payment of maintenance and
claiming arrears. In those proceedings, the learned Magistrate passed the
2
Criminal Misc. Application No.557 of 2024........Sanjeev Agarwal vs. State of Uttarakhand & Another.
Ashish Naithani J.
##PAGE3##impugned order dated 01.02.2024, issuing a recovery warrant for ₹
5,69,167/- against the Applicant.
9. Aggrieved by the issuance of the recovery warrant, the Applicant
has approached this Court invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Section
482 CrPC, contending that the impugned order was passed ex parte,
without proper opportunity of hearing, and without adjudication of
objections relating to the calculation of the alleged arrears.
10. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that the impugned
order dated 01.02.2024, issuing a recovery warrant of ₹ 5,69,167/-, was
passed in clear violation of the principles of natural justice. It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.