SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 40043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SALMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

24TH DECEMBER, 2025 SECOND BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.333 of 2025 Salman ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The applicant- Salman is in judicial custody for the offence punishable under Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Case Crime No.386 of 2025, registered at Police Station Bahadrabad, District Haridwar.

2. The First Bail Application (No.2032 of 2025) was dismissed as withdrawn on 19.12.2025 granting liberty to the applicant to file afresh.

3. According to the First Information Report dated 05.10.2025, the police recovered 35.31 gm smack from the co-accused Vijay Kumar. He was arrested. Vijay Kumar told the police that he was going to sell the recovered smack to Salman (applicant). He and Salman sell smack in schools and colleges around Roorkee.

4. Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top